To the extent I can tell, UberPop and UberX are near indistinguishable, and the two frameworks exist for political reasons in nations where legitimate decisions disallow unlicenced cabs from working as a business, to create wage. Ie. there are places where individuals are permitted to do “ride share” and get an offer of costs, yet not to be doing it to make a benefit, so Uber has pronounced UberPOP to be an administration for drivers not making a benefit.
Obviously, there is evading the tenets going ahead here. Many individuals endorse, and feel that the tenets encompassing ride administrations are ancient and hostile to focused, and hurt people in general more than they help it; in that capacity they approve of Uber doing legitimate fictions to help break new ground and revolutionalize the ride business. Others push for stricter requirement of ride rules, for the sake of open wellbeing, legitimate protection for drivers, and to ensure the taxi imposing business models.